NAAC

Institutional Assessment and Accreditation

(Effective from July 2017)

Accreditation - (Cycle: 1)


MENDIPATHAR COLLEGE, Mendipathar, Meghalaya

Track ID : MLCOGN101121

AISHE-ID : C-16312


Graphical Representation based on Quantitative & Qualitative Metrics



NAAC LOGO

NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL

An Autonomous Institution of the University Grants Commission

P.O. Box No. 1075, Nagarbhavi, Bengaluru - 560 072, INDIA



Graphical Representation based on Quantitative & Qualitative Metrics



Created with Highcharts 6.0.1QnM & QlM Weightage scored bythe institution in percentageCurricular AspectsTeaching-learningand EvaluationTeaching-learning and EvaluationResearch,Innovations andExtensionResearch, Innovations and ExtensionInfrastructure andLearning ResourcesInfrastructure and Learning ResourcesStudent Support andProgressionStudent Support and ProgressionGovernance,Leadership andManagementGovernance, Leadership and ManagementInstitutional Valuesand Best PracticesInstitutional Values and Best Practices7050100Metrics(QnM & QlM) Weightage scored by the institution in percentageFig: The criterion wise distribution of weighted scores (QnM & QlM) for the institution
Research, Innovations and Extension
QnM & QlM Weightage scored by
the institution in percentage: 29.17


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Key IndicatorsGPAHigh Performance Key IndicatorsAverage Performance Key IndicatorsLow Performance Key IndicatorsAcademic FlexibilityStudent Enrollment …Student Enrollment and ProfileStudent Satisfaction…Student Satisfaction SurveyMaintenance of Ca…Maintenance of Campus InfrastructureCurricular Planning …Curricular Planning and ImplementationTeaching- Learning …Teaching- Learning ProcessTeacher Profile and …Teacher Profile and QualityEvaluation Process …Evaluation Process and ReformsPhysical FacilitiesIT InfrastructureInstitutional Vision …Institutional Vision and LeadershipCurriculum Enrichm…Curriculum EnrichmentFeedback SystemCatering to Student…Catering to Student DiversityStudent Performanc…Student Performance and Learning OutcomesResource Mobilizati…Resource Mobilization for ResearchInnovation Ecosyste…Innovation EcosystemResearch Publicatio…Research Publications and AwardsExtension ActivitiesCollaborationLibrary as a Learnin…Library as a Learning ResourceStudent SupportStudent ProgressionStudent Participatio…Student Participation and ActivitiesAlumni EngagementStrategy Developm…Strategy Development and DeploymentFaculty Empowerme…Faculty Empowerment StrategiesFinancial Managem…Financial Management and Resource MobilizationInternal Quality Ass…Internal Quality Assurance SystemInstitutional Values …Institutional Values and Social ResponsibilitiesBest PracticesInstitutional Distinc…Institutional Distinctiveness012345Low Performance Key IndicatorsCollaboration: 0.5Comparison of QnM & QlM in Key Indicators based on performance(GPA)Fig: The comparison of Key Indicators (QnM & QlM) based on grade point average(GPA) extracted from the institution


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1GPA440.670.671.51.53.673.67220.750.753.323.32001100220.50.51.351.353.53.51.481.480.440.440.60.611110.830.831.41.41.331.330.90.92222LPKI (0-2.0)HPKI (3.01-4.0)Academic FlexibilityCurriculum Enrich…Curriculum EnrichmentFeedback SystemStudent Enrollme…Student Enrollment and ProfileCatering to Stude…Catering to Student DiversityStudent Performa…Student Performance and Learning OutcomesStudent Satisfacti…Student Satisfaction SurveyResource Mobiliza…Resource Mobilization for ResearchInnovation Ecosys…Innovation EcosystemResearch Publicati…Research Publications and AwardsExtension ActivitiesCollaborationLibrary as a Learn…Library as a Learning ResourceMaintenance of Ca…Maintenance of Campus InfrastructureStudent SupportStudent ProgressionStudent Participati…Student Participation and ActivitiesAlumni Engageme…Alumni EngagementStrategy Develop…Strategy Development and DeploymentFaculty Empower…Faculty Empowerment StrategiesFinancial Manage…Financial Management and Resource MobilizationInternal Quality A…Internal Quality Assurance SystemInstitutional Value…Institutional Values and Social ResponsibilitiesBest PracticesInstitutional Distin…Institutional Distinctiveness012345Comparison of LPKI and HPKI based on QnM & QlMFig: Comparison of LPKI(0-2.0) and HPKI(3.01-4.0) based on QnM & QlM


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Distribution of High Performance Key Indicators (3.01-4.0)Fig: High Performance Key Indicators(3.01-4.0) for the institutionAcademic Flexibility:27.6%Academic Flexibility:27.6%Student Enrollment and Profile:25.3%Student Enrollment and Profile:25.3%Student Satisfaction Survey:22.9%Student Satisfaction Survey:22.9%Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure:24.2%Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure:24.2%Academic FlexibilityKey Indicator Performance: 27.6%


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Distribution of Average Performance Key Indicators (2.01-3.0)Fig: Average Performance Key Indicators(2.01-3.0) for the institutionCurricular Planning and Implementation:14.5%Curricular Planning and Implementation:14.5%Teaching- Learning Process:11.6%Teaching- Learning Process:11.6%Teacher Profile and Quality:15.8%Teacher Profile and Quality:15.8%Evaluation Process and Reforms:11.6%Evaluation Process and Reforms:11.6%Physical Facilities:15.8%Physical Facilities:15.8%IT Infrastructure:15.1%IT Infrastructure:15.1%Institutional Vision and Leadership:15.8%Institutional Vision and Leadership:15.8%


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Distribution of Low Performance Key Indicators (0-2.0)Fig: Low Performance Key Indicators(0-2.0) for the institutionCurriculum Enrichment:2.9%Curriculum Enrichment:2.9%Feedback System:6.6%Feedback System:6.6%Catering to Student Diversity:8.8%Catering to Student Diversity:8.8%Student Performance and Learning Outcomes:3.3%Student Performance and Learning Outcomes:3.3%Resource Mobilization for Research:0.0%Resource Mobilization for Research:0.0%Innovation Ecosystem:4.4%Innovation Ecosystem:4.4%Research Publications and Awards:0.0%Research Publications and Awards:0.0%Extension Activities:8.8%Extension Activities:8.8%Collaboration:2.2%Collaboration:2.2%Library as a Learning Resource:5.9%Library as a Learning Resource:5.9%Student Support:6.5%Student Support:6.5%Student Progression:1.9%Student Progression:1.9%Student Participation and Activities:2.6%Student Participation and Activities:2.6%Alumni Engagement:4.4%Alumni Engagement:4.4%Strategy Development and Deployment:4.4%Strategy Development and Deployment:4.4%Faculty Empowerment Strategies:3.6%Faculty Empowerment Strategies:3.6%Financial Management and Resource Mobilization:6.2%Financial Management and Resource Mobilization:6.2%Internal Quality Assurance System:5.8%Internal Quality Assurance System:5.8%Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities:4.0%Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities:4.0%Best Practices:8.8%Best Practices:8.8%Institutional Distinctiveness:8.8%Institutional Distinctiveness:8.8%Strategy Development and DeploymentKey Indicator Performance: 4.4%


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1GPAComparison of Criteria based on Criteria Grade Point AverageFig: Comparison of Criteria based on Criteria Grade Point Average2.252.252.472.471.171.172.732.730.920.921.331.331.451.45Criteria GPACurricular AspectsTeaching-learning …Teaching-learning and EvaluationResearch, Innovat…Research, Innovations and ExtensionInfrastructure and…Infrastructure and Learning ResourcesStudent Support a…Student Support and ProgressionGovernance, Lead…Governance, Leadership and ManagementInstitutional Value…Institutional Values and Best Practices012345Governance, Leadership and ManagementGPA: 1.33


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1MetricsBenchmark ValuePerformance of metrics in Curricular Aspects, Teaching-learning and EvaluationFig: Performance of metrics in Criteria I & II33114444444422000022114433443300112244221144334400442222223311220033Score1.1.11.1.21.1.31.2.11.2.21.2.31.3.11.3.21.3.31.4.11.4.22.1.12.1.22.1.32.2.12.2.22.2.32.3.12.3.22.3.32.3.42.4.12.4.22.4.32.4.42.4.52.5.12.5.22.5.32.5.42.6.12.6.22.6.32.7.10123451.4.2Benchmark Value: 1


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1MetricsBenchmark ValuePerformance of metrics in Research, Innovations and Extension, Infrastructure and Learning ResourcesFig: Performance of metrics in Criteria III & IV000022000000000033000033001122223344222233000011114444004433Score3.1.13.1.23.2.13.2.23.3.13.3.23.3.33.3.43.4.13.4.23.4.33.4.43.5.13.5.24.1.14.1.24.1.34.1.44.2.14.2.24.2.34.2.44.2.54.2.64.3.14.3.24.3.34.3.44.4.14.4.2012345


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1MetricsBenchmark ValuePerformance of metrics in Student Support and Progression, Governance, Leadership and Management,Institutional Values and Best PracticesPerformance of metrics in Student Support and Progression, Governance, Leadership and Management, Institutional Values and Best PracticesFig: Performance of metrics in Criteria V,VI & VII44110011004400110000221122001133332222001111110011113300222211001122002200001100334400000044440000440022222222Score5.1.15.1.35.1.55.2.15.2.35.3.25.4.15.4.36.1.26.2.26.2.46.3.26.3.46.4.16.4.36.5.26.5.47.1.17.1.37.1.57.1.77.1.97.1.117.1.137.1.157.1.177.1.197.3.1012345


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1MetricsScoreScore1.3.21.3.32.2.22.4.42.6.33.1.13.1.23.2.23.3.13.3.23.3.33.3.43.4.23.4.33.5.11.1.31.2.11.2.21.2.32.1.12.1.32.3.22.4.12.4.32.4.50123453.2.2 Score: 0Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1MetricsScoreScore4.2.44.2.54.3.45.1.35.1.55.2.15.2.35.3.15.4.26.2.36.3.36.4.26.5.37.1.17.1.107.1.117.1.147.1.157.1.177.1.37.1.47.1.67.1.94.1.44.3.24.3.34.4.15.1.15.1.67.1.127.1.137.1.167.1.8012345Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Score1.3.21.3.32.2.22.4.42.6.33.1.13.1.23.2.23.3.13.3.23.3.33.3.43.4.23.4.33.5.11.1.31.2.11.2.21.2.32.1.12.1.32.3.22.4.12.4.32.4.525024Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Score4.2.44.2.54.3.45.1.35.1.55.2.15.2.35.3.15.4.26.2.36.3.36.4.26.5.37.1.17.1.107.1.117.1.147.1.157.1.177.1.37.1.47.1.67.1.94.1.44.3.24.3.34.4.15.1.15.1.67.1.127.1.137.1.167.1.833024Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)